This fixes a consistent bug for me, where the expandRecursively call
(somehow) predates the room list being populated. Which resulted in some
or all sections being collapsed on start-up.
(cherry picked from commit 431dbf6457)
It wasn't possible to edit the shortcode or description anymore, because
signals weren't hooked up. I also added a separator to help separate
some of these controls visually.
(cherry picked from commit 4e616d53b2)
You may have noticed that the room list acts a bit... odd. You usually
can't scroll all the way down with a scrollwheel, it just
stops. It's possible to continue a little bit more with the scrollbar.
And sometimes the scrollbar doesn't know how big it's actually supposed
to be, commonly occuring when switching from a large room list to a
smaller one.
I narrowed it down the same usual problem with views in QtQuick:
variable sized delegates! Using GammaRay I figured out that for the
delegates currently in use they're slightly different: 46 pixels for
regular room delegates, 42 pixels for section headers and the "Find your
Friends" button was also different.
*Technically* TableView (and by extension TreeView) is supposed to allow
variable-sized delegates, and we should be able to advertise that with
rowHeightProvider. I tried a bunch of different solutions and none of
them worked reliably, so I took the usual sledgehammer approach of
making all of the delegates the same size.
This fixes all of the obvious bugs with the room list I could see, with
the one visual downside of making the section headers slightly taller.
But since I spent some time improving the tap targets, this is only a
visual change and not a functional one.
I also made sure to test it in compact mode, and everything shrinks as
expected.
(cherry picked from commit d47a4eb0de)
Or changing the height of the chatbar in other ways, which I'm sure is
going to become more common with our new rich text system.
(cherry picked from commit e4c9230c09)
This matches the behavior in other room lists. I also tried to normalize
the constructor with SortFilterRoomTreeModel.
(cherry picked from commit 847db41fb3)
For some reason I don't understand, the ItemDelegate used for these
sections are ginormous. There is quite a bit of padding which confuses
users as its unexpectedly used for the tap area.
I changed it so we only listen for taps inside of the contentItem
itself, which is a more suitable area.
(cherry picked from commit 115d4e7466)
I did this for images a while back, but not for these. Otherwise you
can't press escape or perform other key navigation functions easily.
BUG: 515462
FIXED-IN: 25.12.2
(cherry picked from commit 793f81e733)
The comparison operator was reversed, and this was seen with mark as
read being broken and buttons showing up at the wrong times.
(cherry picked from commit 9ace01f74a)
This is just more ergonomic (in my opinion) as you usually want to
select some text from a code block, instead of maximizing it. There's
already an easy-to-access button for maximizing if you want to.
BUG: 499048
FIXED-IN: 25.12.2
(cherry picked from commit 332a822996)
We still had the default opaque background for RoomPage. I added a
comment too so it isn't removed accidentally in the future.
BUG: 513363
FIXED-IN: 25.12.2
(cherry picked from commit f145bbe8db)
This is some bug in Flow (that is really hard to debug, I can't get it
to exit at all) but we can work around it for a minor visual impact. It
seems to me allow the reaction list to become slightly larger, but
that's about it.
BUG: 504344
FIXED-IN: 25.12.2
(cherry picked from commit 93e932c09c)
This is similar to the TimelineView hacks, but this time its the header
item that's changing height as our room topics and such wrap.
(cherry picked from commit 6eb2b2e739)
This is due to some kind of bug in ListView that never resettles
properly for bottom-to-top views. This can arise when the pinned message
is loaded (because that squishes the view) or the window is resized
(because that also resizes the view.)
We can work around it by assuming the following:
1. The RoomPage knows the window is resizing because it gets its height
changed before TimelineView.
2. The first height change can be a marker to position the view at the
beginning.
This fixes the issue for me, I did the following in order to test this:
* Switch between many rooms, especially ones with a pinned message. Now
all of them start at the bottom as they should.
* Resize the window, ensure that if you scrolled it stays around that
position - otherwise it sticks at the bottom.
(cherry picked from commit 39de4d10e4)
I found that 50% of the time, NeoChat won't restore the last space but
instead get stuck at Home. Even worse, it will overwrite Home's last
opened room with the one from the space - resulting in really buggy
behavior.
The reason why this happens is partly due to the space hierarchy cache
(I think) but that's not the real problem in my opinion. During
setCurrentSpace, we needlessly update the last space & room config
despite us being the ones already reading it.
In addition to that I also refactored this code a bit to be more
consolidated and readable.
(cherry picked from commit 4c37dcf518)
This fixes the annoying "I just scrolled down to the bottom, how come
NeoChat doesn't think I did?"
From what I can tell this is also ListView bug (or something caused by
our style/Kirigami) that creates cases like contentY being -643.2 (for a
ListView of height 643) thus that's not "at Y's end". For our case
though, we don't care and can safely round it.
(cherry picked from commit 3c77711417)
Changed a check to use isDirectChat (which is a clearer indication of
what we want.) I also made sure not to show the account name if you only
have one, since that's just useless noise.
(cherry picked from commit fc6f345036)
`decryptMessage` returns null if it fails to decode the passed message. This value
then got fed into `EventHandler::richBody` which logged a warning and cleared `m_pinnedMessage`.
If we instead retain the value as an `EncryptedEvent`, the UI will pin the encrypted event
placeholder instead of hiding the existence of pins.
(cherry picked from commit 71c84be4b4)